Showing posts with label Social Media. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Social Media. Show all posts

Friday, January 2, 2009

Social Media 2009 predictions --Draft--

I am compiling these predictions as part of a project assignment; I will continuously update this post through today. Any comments/thoughts are welcome and appreciated (and attribution, as always, will be given).

Please don't mind the format; I am more focused on posting the ideas; there is also no particular order in this post yet.

The need for ongoing social dialog will change Organizations structure and operation:

Organizations will come to terms with the fact that “shoot and forget” is not valid anymore; every time a message (offer, campaign product, service, etc.) is submitted to a consumer/customer/target audience they need to assume a public consumer response will follow, and a public response to that response will be necessary.. This implies social dialog will be established and there are very few organizations ready (in skills, structure, processes/methods) to engage in dialog with their consumers; these will open many opportunities to help these organizations get ready for this new reality. The ongoing social dialog reality will make organizations re-evaluate their internal structures or at least their internal communications and escalation procedures; regardless of the size of the organization the consumer perceives it as a coherent entity and expects to be able to engage with it about anything through any of the available communication channels; silo organizations will struggle to satisfy this need and their consumers will become frustrated and, whenever possible, move on to other providers for their needs.

The Consumer as a Product:

Organizations will turn to Social Media to better understand their consumers/customer/target audience needs (simply listening at large, in private spaces, in public spaces hosted by the company or others); listening and empathy will become key marketing skills (shouldn’t that have always be the case?). “The Consumer” as a product will become more and more important; what this means is that having the attention, ability to communicate with and quickly present products and services to an specific consumer audience will become as (if not more) important than the capacity to create the products to satisfy the needs for that audience.

Social Media Relationship as a key agency service:

Helping organizations to identify the individuals and organizations (Blogs, communities, groups, forums, etc.) that are key to the validation, adoption and propagation of their messages (offer, campaign product, service, etc.) as well as the right way to engage with them (language, value to offer, way to approach, how to establish and maintain a relationship, how to sunset a relationship) and execution on that engagement will become a key service agencies will offer their clients; larger organizations/companies will have their own internal department in charge of these activities.

Intimacy and update services will become critical:

Through 2008 many consumers amassed and amazing number of online relationships; some simply a reflection of their already existing set of relations and some completely new. Services and products that can help them keep updated, be visible (or not), and selectively communicate with selected (and likely overlapping) circles among these online relationships (regardless of the social network where they may exist) will become important.
Think about these circles:



  • Who do you want to update with your latest status right now? (i.e. “I have published my thesis here” versus “I have smashed the Halo record!”)
  • Who do you want to hear status / comments / messages from (or not) right now? (i.e. you are resting in the weekend versus you are attending a panel discussion)
  • Who do you want to be visible to/reachable by from right now? (i.e. you are free on a Friday evening versus you are heading to an important meeting?)
  • Etc.

Note: the circles denote artificial groupings; individuals among my online relationships will likely belong to more than one of these circles.

The Social Media Platform “Commodization” begins.

Social Network “Platforms” will begin their slow but certain migration toward the “commodity” status; and there will be more emphasis on the “Why”, “Whom” and “How” than in the “Where”. Organizations (and the agencies that help them) will become more focused on figuring out if they need to have a conversation with their consumers, on how that conversation should work and who should participate on that conversation.. and less emphasis on where (Facebook, Myspace, Twitter, etc.) that conversation is happening.
Note: By no means predicting the demise of any of the SN mentioned above in 2009 (quite the contrary for some of them); but this is a shift in thinking that is coming: We will hear “What should be my Facebook strategy” less and less and more people will begin to focus more on who do they want to have a relationship with and with what objective, and then later on where will this happen.

Mobile Social Networking as primary versus secondary access.

The trend has clearly began (see Facebook’s mobile growth in 2008); but the combination of increased capabilities (iPhone, BlackBerry, etc.) and Platform Push (iPhone, Blackberry) it will consolidate in 2009. The key occurrence is that 2009 will see Social Networking applications and services created first and foremost for mobile devices become mainstream; these services and applications will take advantage of the unique and distinct capabilities of the mobile device and the availability/convergence of data about the individual (schedule, availability, contacts, location, direction, pace, status, time, etc.) to offer unique services and features. There will certainly be online/pc versions of the same applications and services that complement what can be done with mobile with the unique capabilities of the pc device (better for editing, composing, etc.) but these will be offer as complement of the mobile experience.

Convergence of texting, comments, micro blogging, status update platforms:

Platforms and services that allow the user (as creator or consumer) to de-focus from the difference between the texting, comments, micro blogging, status update, etc. activities and instead simply pay attention to the creation or consumption of those will come in place; these snippets of UGC will be easily associated with other objects (Blog posts, Movies, Newspaper Articles, etc.) and easy to consumer through subscriptions/association with the objects or topical areas (i.e. comments on sports about x team; or about individuals in x circle).

Facebook steps up, expands out and in.

Facebook will go above and beyond in 2009; transitioning from the social network platform to begin providing (beyond their current set of apps) more and better ways for brands/companies to engage and interact with its users; while at the same time keeping the control at the individual level (Facebook could, in fact, become the pragmatic instantiation of the VRM concepts). It will do this through aggressive expansion of Facebook connect (virtually bridging and bringing into Facebook the functionality & capabilities that today exist in other sites/services) as well as increasing its core set of services and capabilities (i.e. offering a serious social shopping module and rating & reviews as part of its core capabilities).

The battle for the Social Graph is openly declared

The Social Graph (i.e. the instantiation of Facebook is the Newsfeed) will be the next battle ground; Facebook, Microsoft and likely Google will compete in this space as the most patent opportunity to attract brand/organization money to social networks. Clearly Facebook has something of a head start with its fast growing user base and Facebook Connect; however Microsoft could pull out some interesting tricks if they care able to capitalize on their active hotmail user base (230 million) and Google could really bring forward interesting opportunities through data crunching and algorithms.

The economic crisis will push Social Network Platforms to open the data coffers.

As we all know the pressure to bring forward benchmark data to demonstrate Social media marketing approaches can deliver ROI, as well as the pressure to carefully measure Social Media efforts to prove (or disprove) ROI is increasing. In the past the major Social Networks (i.e. Facebook, Youtube) have not necessarily been the best providers of this data (or partners in capturing it) as the cheer activity numbers (and the economic abundance) seemed to work together to dismiss the need for it, not any more. In 2009 these Social Platform Companies will increase their efforts to open the data coffers and partner with others to capture and offer the data that proves and enables Social Media efforts ROI.

Mobile Livecasting fuels a new type of Social Interaction:

Though not limited to Social I believe this will have broad implications: The increased speed of the mobile networks, coupled with the diminishing cost of storage and the fact that even the most humble phones today have a decent camera will result on the advent of “livecasting” capabilities / products / services; users will have the possibility to document their every single step and share/publish as broad or exclusive as they desire with their social network.

Influencers will become easier to identify; the focus will shift to engagement & activation

With the increased availability of data called out above it will be easier to identify influencers across specific circles (and across different set of ‘influencer type’ criteria) (i.e. who do you seek advice from for computers? What about music? Who propagates messages faster? Further? Deeper?) Social Network tools will offer better capabilities and metrics to identify these influencers; the questions will become more about: how do you engage these influencers? How do you activate them? We will need to keep in mind these are (in general) individuals that will only do what they believe in, and thus they have to be convinced (or properly informed) about the benefits of a product/service before they influence others with it; and will be both about what you say and how you say it...

Social Media will mean more than friends

Though “Friends” (Fans, etc.) has been one of the forms of Social relationships most pursued in Social Media efforts in the past 2009 will see the branch out into other types of Social Relationships/Interactions; there are many cases where I many not want to establish a relationship with others that care about the same that I do, but I may want to know that they care about it, why and what other things they care about and why …(i.e. in the case of illness afflictions, tough personal situations, etc.) (not to be confused with anonymous participations). Social Bookmarking/Tagging potential will become better understood and different ways to navigate data will become available that will facilitate social influence beyond direct/close relationships (such as friendship)

(there may be more to come, but not today)

What do you think?


Filiberto Selvas

Wednesday, December 31, 2008

My Social Media Wishes for 2009

This is a time when many of the wise individuals I follow in various social media channels come forward with their next year predictions; that is not the intention of this post (but that other post will come)…

These are wishes, things I hope will happen but I won’t go as far as saying that they will happen. If you have other things you wish for I’d love to hear about them!

(This will likely be a post I add to a couple times in the next week or two)

In no particular order:

Semantics! I firmly believe one of the key challenges of the Social Media space is that we tend to call the same thing different names and apply the same names to completely different things; what is “engagement”? What does “conversation” implies?

I wish for 2009 to be the year when all of us interested in Social Media make emphasis in defining a common set of terms for our trade and make a point of using those terms consistently.

Metrics! As many have called/are calling out: the time when we could get Social Media to fly without proper measures for success (or benchmarks to support the concept that it has a chance of success) are over. Progress has been made (see here http://www.goingsocialnow.com/2008/12/tracking-social-influence-razo.html and here http://mashable.com/2008/12/29/brand-reputation-monitoring-tools/) but we need to get to the point where Direct Marketing finds itself today; the professionals in that discipline use standard measures and can easily compare their efforts within and across organizations.

I wish for 2009 to be the year when all of us interested in Social Media make emphasis in defining a common set of metrics for our trade and make a point of applying and presenting those metrics consistently.

It is not easy! Our discipline has been plagued by a misconception from the beginning; it is perceived by many as the “easy” or “cheap” or “inexplicable” way to do marketing. Non withstanding honorable exceptions: success in social media comes out of careful planning, astute execution and willingness to invest in the long time (hey; it is a relationship!)

I wish for 2009 to be the year when Social Media is given the treatment and consideration other more established disciplines (such as CRM, SEO, Branding, etc.) are given. That it becomes clear this is a professional trade with its own tools, specialties and skills.

It is not temporary; it is not a one off! I think what many have missed regarding Social Media is that it is about relationships; with and among your consumers/target audience. Do you pursue someone you really want to have close to you to simply then shut off those efforts and go dark for a long time and then re-surface somewhere else using a completely different set of approaches? No, you don’t (and if you do you are very lonely).

I wish for 2009 to be the year when Social Media efforts are clearly understood as Relationship Marketing efforts; and proper thinking is placed on what will happen to the relationships that have been established once the specific campaign/tactic you are running now is over.

It works, and it doesn’t have to be the latest for it to work! I can’t remember the number of times I have had some Social Media tactics/concepts challenged to just find out that the problem was that they were poorly applied/executed; even when I love the latest as much as anyone else we need to make less emphasis on “the new thing” and more on the sound application of the basics.

I wish for 2009 to be the year when Social Media practitioners make a point of following best practices and applying social media tactics in simple, elegant ways rather than trying to always come up with the newest most daring concept.

Test, Learn and be willing to not do it if it is not the right thing! (paraphrasing a wish that came from Digitalista http://twitter.com/digitalista). I completely agree with this one; it has been one of my secret desires to someday see someone rewarded for not doing something; because it was not the right thing to do.

I wish for 2009 to be the year when Social Media practitioners carefully consider their alternatives, test and bravely recommend not to move forward with something if it is not the right thing to do.

What do you wish for? (In Social Media, that is)

Filiberto Selvas

Thursday, December 11, 2008

Social Media Strategists: Can we learn from the past?

Re-post from my old blog; original here: http://selvascano.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!D7439E6DC600CAE9!1505.entry

For a while know I have been worried that Social Media, Social Networking, Online Communities seem to be heading down a path that is familiar to me, and that I’d rather have all of us avoid if we can….

I did an experiment: I searched for the key reasons CRM projects failed; I took snippets of one of the the articles I found (here the original, credit and eyeballs due to Adrian Mello) and I replaced CRM by Social Media…. Please read the results below; sounds to me we are at risk of repeating the mistakes, and we need to make an effort to learn from the past:

· …It's much more common for SOCIAL MEDIA projects to fail because of a lack of alignment with the business goals, inadequate organizational preparation, and other problems arising from ineffective business planning and management….

· ..One of the biggest sources of failure arises when enterprises put SOCIAL MEDIA tools in place before forging a clear customer strategy…..SOCIAL MEDIA tools can be used for a variety of purposes so companies need to identify their goals…Do you want to reduce the costs of handling customer inquiries? Do you want to acquire new customers? … Without answering these questions companies usually pick the wrong SOCIAL MEDIA tools. <or program strategies>

· Some enterprises have a customer strategy, but it's far too broad. Overreaching SOCIAL MEDIA projects usually fail…..Companies can avoid failures by establishing carefully defined short-term business objectives.

· Although project objectives should be highly specific, they must still fit into an overall strategy…. When they are administered as isolated "stove pipes," SOCIAL MEDIA programs usually fail…..Individual SOCIAL MEDIA projects need to be coordinated and project leaders need to communicate with each other.

· ….Even enterprises that develop a sensible customer strategy will still fail in their SOCIAL MEDIA efforts if they don't modify their organizations to reflect that strategy. A SOCIAL MEDIA rollout must shape appropriate employee attitudes and behavior before the technology is deployed…

· ….A common misconception about SOCIAL MEDIA is that it deals only with superficial processes due to its customer-facing nature. To be successful, SOCIAL MEDIA requires deep change within an organization…..

That should be enough to make my point; what do you think?

Filiberto Selvas